<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Working Title &#187; Research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andrewcafourek.com/category/research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andrewcafourek.com</link>
	<description>everything in flux: the homepage of andrew cafourek</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>String Theory for Dummies</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewcafourek.com/2007/08/23/string-theory-for-dummies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewcafourek.com/2007/08/23/string-theory-for-dummies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 04:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewcafourek.com/2007/08/23/string-theory-for-dummies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I stumbled across this video clip a couple days ago on a site called My Self Development, which is a pretty good spot to find some things that will stretch your mind.  It is a good site to spend a few minutes a day browsing, because it seems that you always stumble upon [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I stumbled across this video clip a couple days ago on a site called <a href="http://myselfdevelopment.net/" target="_blank">My Self Development</a>, which is a pretty good spot to find some things that will stretch your mind.  It is a good site to spend a few minutes a day browsing, because it seems that you always stumble upon something new that makes you say, &#8220;<a href="http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/pic/PS/87665~Dude-Wtf-Posters.jpg" target="_blank">Huh?</a>&#8221;  But like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Wendell_Holmes%2C_Jr." target="_blank">Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.</a> said: &#8220;The human mind, once stretched to a new idea, never goes back to its original dimensions.&#8221;</p>
<p>I actually first saw this video on <a href="http://del.icio.us/" target="_blank">del.icio.us</a> link and got hooked on the site from there, but I think this is a good first experience!  In the video, the narrator will use cartoons and simply analogies to walk through a step-by-step trip from the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimension" target="_blank">first dimension</a> to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory" target="_blank">tenth</a>.  Somewhere around five or six, your mind will start to mush and by ten you will either be highly enlightened or in need of a <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0387808/" target="_blank">bad movie</a> to relax your gray matter.  Either way, you will feel a little bit smarter tomorrow!</p>
<p><embed src="http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=-97057222894136590&amp;hl=en" style="width: 400px; height: 326px" id="VideoPlayback" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewcafourek.com/2007/08/23/string-theory-for-dummies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The e-President?</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewcafourek.com/2007/08/20/the-e-president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewcafourek.com/2007/08/20/the-e-president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 02:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2008]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[User-Generated]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewcafourek.com/?p=47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Mashable, a new poll released by Global Market Insite (GMI) shows astonishing results regarding the impact of social networks on the upcoming presidential election.
17% of respondents said they had looked at a candidate&#8217;s profile on some social networking site such as MySpace or Facebook, and 53% of them said they were more likely [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://mashable.com/2007/08/20/gmi-presidential-elections-social-networks/" target="_blank">Mashable</a>, a new poll released by <a href="http://www.gmi-mr.com/" target="_blank">Global Market Insite</a> (GMI) shows astonishing results regarding the impact of social networks on the upcoming presidential election.</p>
<p>17% of respondents said they had looked at a candidate&#8217;s profile on some social networking site such as MySpace or Facebook, and 53% of them said they were more likely to vote for that candidate after seeing their profile!  53% of those who had looked is equal to approximately 9% of the total survey sample, which may sound low, but MySpace has well over 100 million users and <a href="http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2007/08/17/the-numbers-from-facebook-themselves/" target="_blank">Facebook boasts 35 million</a> (and growing by approx. 1 million/wk), so a 9% win-over rate is a pretty health showing!  (I realize that not all users are in the US, or registered voters, etc&#8230;but you get the idea that it is a lot of people)</p>
<p>What might be the most astonishing statistic to come out of this survey is that 62% of those people who browsed a candidate&#8217;s profile, were over the age of 30!  This is a huge development that shows how much these online arenas will be changing the political world int he near future.  The are no longer a child&#8217;s playground, but adults are using them too&#8230;if it were all college-aged users browsing these profiles, the numbers wouldn&#8217;t be very exciting since the 18-27 age bracket is the least democratically involved at the polls.  However, the 30-45 age bracket is very active in elections, making these survey results very important to the upcoming election.</p>
<p>One thing to say about this survey, however, is that I haven&#8217;t seen the actual text of the complete survey or the methodology behind it, so I can&#8217;t vouch for its integrity.  And it may well be that people who look at candidates&#8217; profiles were more inclined to vote for them before and that is what drove them to the site&#8230;but even if this is the case, this data shows that the face of politics is changing in America.</p>
<p>The emergence of the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/debates" target="_blank">YouTube debates</a>, the explosion of social networking site users, and the expansion of each candidate&#8217;s online presence is a sign that the old-media way of vetting candidate&#8217;s is shifting and the public is adopting its own way of doing things.  With the hotly contested elections in the recent past, it is very possible that whoever manages to capture the largest portion of that 9% of users could tip the election in their favor by the slimmest of margins&#8230;and we are still over a year away from the general election: there could be ways of voter organization and online political advertising that we haven&#8217;t even though of yet that could spring up and have a major impact on the 2008 election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewcafourek.com/2007/08/20/the-e-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
